<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OFFICIAL:  Firefox 2.0 Alpha Download</title>
	<atom:link href="http://employees.org/~abhinav/blog/2006/03/official-firefox-20-alpha-download/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://employees.org/~abhinav/blog/2006/03/official-firefox-20-alpha-download/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: abhinav</title>
		<link>http://employees.org/~abhinav/blog/2006/03/official-firefox-20-alpha-download/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>abhinav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 04:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://employees.org/~abhinav/blog/2006/03/22/official-firefox-20-alpha-download/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt; If you use 2.0 your bookmarks will be lost in some binary SQL format, never to be seen again.
&lt;/em&gt;

While 2.0 &lt;em&gt; does &lt;/em&gt; store bookmarks in binary SQL, the original bookmarks.html file is infact intact - So you just need to copy or import it if you go back to 1.5

&lt;em&gt;
This is a huge step backward for Firefox, we should all stop and demand our user data continue to be stored in human readable XML format! &lt;/em&gt;

While SQL data can be retrieved, it is not better than the html/xml format. In addition, the fact that the import of bookmarks from 1.5 to 2.0 is not non-destructive &lt;strong&gt; is &lt;/strong&gt; a major turn-off. Hopefully this is set right in the Beta. Remember, this is just an Alpha version of the software - &lt;strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; for production use! :) &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> If you use 2.0 your bookmarks will be lost in some binary SQL format, never to be seen again.<br />
</em></p>
<p>While 2.0 <em> does </em> store bookmarks in binary SQL, the original bookmarks.html file is infact intact - So you just need to copy or import it if you go back to 1.5</p>
<p><em><br />
This is a huge step backward for Firefox, we should all stop and demand our user data continue to be stored in human readable XML format! </em></p>
<p>While SQL data can be retrieved, it is not better than the html/xml format. In addition, the fact that the import of bookmarks from 1.5 to 2.0 is not non-destructive <strong> is </strong> a major turn-off. Hopefully this is set right in the Beta. Remember, this is just an Alpha version of the software - <strong></strong><strong>not</strong> for production use! <img src='http://employees.org/~abhinav/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuckles</title>
		<link>http://employees.org/~abhinav/blog/2006/03/official-firefox-20-alpha-download/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuckles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 06:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://employees.org/~abhinav/blog/2006/03/22/official-firefox-20-alpha-download/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>If you use 2.0 your bookmarks will be  lost in some binary SQL format, never to be seen again.

One bad byte and they all go *poof*.

This is a huge step backward for Firefox, we should all stop and demand our user data continue to be stored in human readable XML format!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you use 2.0 your bookmarks will be  lost in some binary SQL format, never to be seen again.</p>
<p>One bad byte and they all go *poof*.</p>
<p>This is a huge step backward for Firefox, we should all stop and demand our user data continue to be stored in human readable XML format!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
